MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979932981 · doi:10.29173/iasl7215

Blindspots: Serving Your Multicultural Students

2016· article· en· W2979932981 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
ReAnna Laney

Bibliographic record

VenueIASL Annual Conference Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismReading (process)CurriculumMulticultural educationEthnic groupStoryboardPedagogyJigsawMathematics educationSociologyPsychologyComputer scienceMultimediaPolitical scienceAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our schools are full of multicultural families, but most popular children and young adult novels are about monocultural teens. As educators, we have a responsibility to be diverse readers -- reading books across genres featuring characters of different ethnicities, nationalities, genders, orientations, religions, and abilities, that also inspire. Yet it is challenging to present books and resources which reflect your readers and encourages them to experience a wider world. This interactive program includes criteria for diverse collections, programming and unit suggestions, and strategies for proposing changes to your curriculum. Learn how to engage your students with recent controversial topics like: whitewashed book covers, gender-flips, and genre-mashing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIASL Annual Conference ProceedingsSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207