LATE CRETACEOUS STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SOUTHEASTERN CHACO - PARANÁ BASIN (“NORTE BASIN” - URUGUAY): THE MAASTRICHTIAN AGE OF THE CALCRETIZATION PROCESS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last 40 years, successive revisions have been introduced to the lithostratigraphy of the Late Cretaceous of the Norte Basin, whose record is formed by predominantly siliciclastic continental fossiliferous sedimentary rocks. A factor that contributed to the terminology proliferation was the misplaced importance attributed to the epigenetic processes and products (calcretes and ferricretes, occasionally fossiliferous) affecting those siliciclastic rocks. Based on field work and lithological logs from a number of key areas, the validity of the original stratigraphic column showing, from base to top, the Guichón, Mercedes, Asencio and Queguay formations is supported. For those particular units, the lithostratigraphic scope given by the original definitions is correct and, with minimum adjustments, they should be restored for their practical usefulness as geological mapping units. An evolutionary scheme for the Late Cretaceous of the Norte Basin is herein presented, with the aim of contributing to a greater understanding of the succession of sedimentary and epigenetic processes. A Maastrichtian age is proposed for the carbonatic cementation and/or substitution that affected the Mercedes and Asencio formations, thus originating the Queguay Formation, based on absolute age of the calcite cement (~ 72 Ma; U-Pb), paleontological data, and the correlation established with similar events recorded in the Marília Formation on the Bauru Basin (Brazil).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".