Bone Conduction Headphones for Force Feedback in Robotic Surgery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bone conduction headphones (Fig. 1) offer the unique ability to provide auditory information to the user without obstructing external sounds. We apply this technology to robotic surgery to provide the surgeon with force feedback information with minimal distraction. The device is evaluated by pairing it with a force sensor that is attached to a suture pad. Four participants were tasked to complete 25 sutures on the suture pad while either receiving no feedback or audio, visual, or combined feedback that represents the magnitude of their applied force. Trials performed with bone conducting headphones had noticeable improvements compared to previous trials without feedback, while the most noticeable improvements were observed for cases with both visual and auditory feedback. Auditory feedback may have an important role in a robotic surgery setting and bone conduction headphones may enable this form of feedback with minimal distraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it