Impact of disuse muscular atrophy on the compound muscle action potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disuse atrophy from immobilization is the result of decreased neural activity and muscle unloading. METHODS: We studied the impact of disuse on hand intrinsic compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in a cohort of 39 patients with unilateral 6-week immobilization of the hand in a cast, after distal radius fracture. We excluded patients with nerve injury. We compared side-to-side CMAP characteristics at the time of cast removal and at a subsequent follow-up visit, after a mean interval of 7.8 weeks. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in CMAP amplitude were noted for the abductor pollicis brevis (29.2%), abductor digiti minimi (19.0%), and first dorsal interosseus (24.9%). There was partial repair of the relative CMAP reduction at the follow-up visit (20.1%, 10.7%, and 8.7%, respectively). There was no significant change in CMAP duration. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a framework for quantifying the degree of hand intrinsic CMAP amplitude reduction attributed to disuse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".