MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980028395 · doi:10.33012/2019.16950

The GALILEO Return Link Service Operational Concept

2019· article· en· W2980028395 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sylvain Delattre, Chiara Scaleggi, Maxime Fontanier, Antonio Rolla, Javier Perez-Bartolome, Jeremie Benoist, Pol Novell

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalileo (satellite navigation)GNSS applicationsTelecommunicationsService (business)Computer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemSatellite navigationGNSS augmentationBeaconMedium Earth orbitSatellite systemComputer securitySatelliteBusinessEngineeringGeographyRemote sensingGeosynchronous orbit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Cospas-Sarsat Programme is a satellite based Search and Rescue (SAR) distress alert detection and information distribution system. Conceived as an international, humanitarian SAR system, it was constituted as an intergovernmental organization in 1988 by Canada, France, the USA and the former USSR (replaced by the Russian Federation in 1992). Today, more than 40 countries participate in the operations and the management of the system. European Union’s contribution to the Cospas-Sarsat system, called SAR/Galileo, is made through the Galileo Programme. It encompasses the provision of SAR transponders on-board the Galileo constellation and a geographically distributed ground segment across the European territories. Following the declaration of the Galileo Initial Services in December 2016, this contribution is playing a key role in the Cospas-Sarsat Medium Earth Orbit Search and Rescue system, the MEOSAR. The SAR/Galileo Forward Link Service is an integral part of the MEOSAR system and ensures the detection and localisation of the beacon distress signals through the relay of these signals by the Search and Rescue repeaters on board the Galileo satellites, their reception by the ground stations called MEOLUTs and alerts transmission to the Mission Control Centres (MCC). Soon the Galileo Programme will introduce a new functionality uniquely offered by SAR/Galileo to the Cospas-Sarsat system, called the Return Link Service (RLS). This service provides a communication link towards an activated beacon in distress, allowing relaying of acknowledgement messages through the Galileo L1 navigation (I/NAV E1) signal to compatible distress beacons worldwide. The RLS is provided by a dedicated facility called the Return Link Service Provider (RLSP), hosted and operated by the French Space Agency (CNES) in Toulouse, France. This facility acts as an interface between the Cospas-Sarsat and the Galileo systems : it receives the return link requests from the Cospas-Sarsat Mission Control Centres and prepares the Return Link Message (RLM) to be communicated to the Galileo Ground Mission Segment (GMS) for the transmission through the Galileo L1 signal in space. The main functions of the RLSP are summarized below: • Autonomous management of the RLM (system acknowledgment or Type-1), being the RLSP uniquely responsible for the transmission of a Return Link Message to the emitting beacon once the RLM request has been received and once the location of the alert has been confirmed by the Cospas-Sarsat; • Operations on 7d/24h basis. • Establish specific operational interfaces to: o Receive RLM requests from the French Mission Control Centre (FMCC); o Deliver RLM requests to the GMS and exchange auxiliary data with it; o Select, based on the estimated beacon location, the two most suitable Galileo satellites aiming to maximize the RLM reception probability by the beacon in distress. The development of the RLSP system started end of 2016 and was qualified by the end of 2018. In parallel, the RLS operations were prepared by the French Space Agency, taking into account: • High availability requirements (99,95 % for the RLSP infrastructure), • Strict security and accreditation constraints , • Integration into the current operational SAR/Galileo Forward Link Service without disruptions. In this paper, the authors will provide an overview of the RLSP V1 infrastructure and the associated operational concept. The concept will be described from the Cospas-Sarsat system point of view, from the distress message emission to the return link message reception. In addition, the authors will provide details of the operational concept seen from the RLS provider perspective, describing the actual organisation of the operations and the readiness status to enter into service. Note: © 2019 - European GNSS Agency The paper has been elaborated in the frame of the European Union Programme Galileo. It reflects only the authors’ view. The European Commission, in its quality of Galileo Programme Manager, is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0140.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM)Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207