MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980029642 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2019.2946144

Design of Energy Efficient Hybrid VLC/RF/PLC Communication System for Indoor Networks

2019· article· en· W2980029642 on OpenAlexafffund
Sylvester Aboagye, Ahmed Ibrahim, Telex M. N. Ngatched, Alain R. Ndjiongue, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceVisible light communicationBackhaul (telecommunications)Radio frequencyBenchmark (surveying)Power-line communicationEfficient energy useElectronic engineeringComputer networkWirelessPower (physics)TelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating visible light communication (VLC) system with indoor radio frequency (RF) network is seen as a possible way of increasing the capacity and coverage of indoor networks. In such a hybrid network, the traffic generated at the indoor RF and VLC access points must be backhauled to the core network. Power line communication (PLC) technology is seen as a cost-effective backhaul (BH) solution due to its infrastructure availability in every home. In this letter, a novel system model that captures the joint effect of power and BH flow optimization for hybrid VLC/RF/PLC indoor communication network is proposed. For the proposed system model, the problem of energy efficiency (EE) maximization via power and BH flow optimization is formulated as a non-convex problem, and then transformed into a convex problem via the Dinkelbach's approach. An energy efficient algorithm is proposed to solve this joint problem with guaranteed optimality. Simulation results are used to verify the superiority of the proposed hybrid VLC/RF/PLC system and algorithm over a conventional indoor RF system and equal power allocation benchmark scheme, respectively, in terms of network throughput, power consumption, and EE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207