MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Platelet Toll-Like Receptors: Bridging Inflammation and Immunity

2016· article· en· W2980096240 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Kubes

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateletInflammationImmune systemReceptorCell biologyBiologyPlatelet activationInnate immune systemImmunologyNeutrophil extracellular trapsImmunityBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Since the discovery that there is a series of pattern recognition receptors that allow the immune system to detect pathogens, there has been a lot of work to elucidate the signaling molecules that contribute to this detection system. Although the cell types involved would seem to be just as important, our understanding of which cells are critical remains less well explored. Using intravital imaging to visualize the different cell types, we were surprised to find that in almost all conditions that we examined, platelets were rapidly recruited to afflicted tissues. Under some conditions, platelets bound vascular macrophage including Kupffer cells and helped contain bacteria. These were instantaneous responses. At later times, platelets bound neutrophils and induced the production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) that helped to catch bacteria as well as viruses but did induce some local vascular injury. In some scenarios, platelets bound endothelial cells and whether this was to wall off and contain infections or a hijacking of platelets by bacteria to induce vascular dysfunction and poor perfusion remains unclear. Visualizing platelets in sterile injury also revealed important contributions to helping recruit other immune cells that help to heal. The role of the platelet as an effector in infections and inflammation will be discussed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→