Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the level of leisure and social activities, IADL, and life satisfaction of stroke patients residing in a local community according to their cognitive and physical functions.Methods: The subjects of the study were 159 stroke patients. For testing, a Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment, an Outpatient Physical Therapy Movement Log, a Korean Activity Card Sort, and a life satisfaction level questionnaire were used. The Pearson's correlation and a multi-regressive analysis were also applied.Results: Regarding the influences on the general activity level, the visuospatial executive functions, orientation, attention, abstraction, and lower limbs each had a significant influence. Regarding the IADL of the activity level, the visuospatial executive functions, orientation, attention, and lower limbs had a significant influence. For leisure, the orientation, abstraction, trunk, and lower limbs had a significant influence.Conclusion: It is expected that if an occupational therapy program considering segmented cognitive and physical functions is applied, it will be helpful to improve the activity levels and life satisfaction of stroke patients in a local community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".