MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980115311 · doi:10.33012/2019.17096

Leveraging FMCW-Radar for Autonomous Positioning Systems: Methodology and Application in Downtown Toronto

2019· article· en· W2980115311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (Online)/Proceedings of the Satellite Division's International Technical Meeting (CD-ROM) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceAir navigationInertial navigation systemReal-time computingGNSS augmentationKalman filterGlobal Positioning SystemTelecommunicationsInertial frame of referenceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The industry of land vehicles entered a new era. In which, driving autonomy is the main goal. It caused a rising demand of more accurate driving systems. Vehicle’s positioning technologies play an important role in such systems. It is one of the main pillars in the autonomous perception task. Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has been always used as the main navigation solution provider. However, the GNSS is subjected for several sources of errors. Signal blockage and multi-path issues take place in urban canyons and downtowns of large cities. Such problems showed the weakness of GNSS solution in critical places. Therefore, Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) were used for long time to provide the navigation information during GNSS outages. A specific INS type with lower number of sensors and high effectiveness for land vehicles named three-dimensional reduced inertial sensor system (3DRISS) has been widely considered and used. The 3D-RISS is integrated with GNSS to acquire accurate information. An integration that is mostly carried out by an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). Such solution which can show magnificent performances in open skies. However, in GNSS outages the integrated system has to rely only on the solution provided by the 3D-RISS. Despite the fidelity of 3D-RISS measurements in short-term outages, it suffers from a vast drift in inertial sensor errors for long-term. As a result, ramping up the system for higher multi-sensor fusion integration is a necessity. The solution proposed depends on integrating an FMCW Radar used almost in all levels of driving autonomy with the 3D-RISS/GNSS system. The methodology used was experimented during natural outage periods in downtown Toronto. The difficulty of the area and the nature of the GNSS outages show the fidelity of Radar/RISS/GNSS proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it