MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980123091

Physicians in prehospital care: A review of the clinical and economic evidence

2019· review· en· W2980123091 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Kapustin, Sparsh Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Medical Journal · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaffingEmergency medical servicesMedicineMedical emergencyPrehospital Emergency CareEmergency medical careJudgementNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prehospital care delivery varies across different geographies. Among the starkest differences is the role of the physician in prehospital care and emergency medical services (EMS). In the ‘Anglo-American’ model, ambulances are primarily staffed by emergency medical technicians (EMTs), emergency medical responders (EMRs), and paramedics. In contrast, in the ‘Franco- German’ model, ambulances are commonly staffed by physicians. Physicians can theoretically provide superior prehospital care due to increased level of training, judgement, and competency. However, physician-staffed emergency medical services (PS-EMS) also increase the financial burden on the prehospital care system. This review paper aims to summarize, compare, and analyze the clinical and financial features of these two models in order to identify the best staffing model. The information presented in this paper can aid medical administrators in the decision-making process involved in optimizing their prehospital care delivery system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Medical JournalSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207