MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Prospective Comparison of the Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire (PBQ) and the International Society On Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) in Children Referred to a Tertiary-Care Pediatric Centre.

2012· article· en· W2980136873 on OpenAlexaff
Veerle Labarque, Victor S. Blanchette, Dewi Clark, Paula D. James, Margaret L. Rand

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVon Willebrand diseaseMucocutaneous zoneProspective cohort studyPlatelet disorderPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicinePlateletDiseaseVon Willebrand factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2229 Mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms, such as epistaxis and bruising, are frequent complaints in childhood; a detailed bleeding history is a crucial initial step in determining whether a child presenting with such symptoms has an underlying bleeding disorder. A Pediatric Bleeding Questionnaire (PBQ), based on the MCMDM-1 VWD Bleeding Questionnaire, incorporates 6 pediatric-specific bleeding symptoms (see below) to quantify bleeding severity in children. Bleeding symptoms are scored in a −1 to +4 range, with a −1 score assigned for tooth extraction or surgery if bleeding did not occur in at least 2 procedures, and are summed for all symptoms. An overall PBQ score of ≥2 predicts a diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). The PBQ has also been used to quantify the severity of bleeding symptoms in children with VWD or platelet function disorders (Bowman et al, J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1418; Biss et al, J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:950; Biss et al, J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:1416). The ISTH has developed a Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) to standardize the reporting of bleeding symptoms in adult and pediatric populations; bleeding symptoms are scored in a 0 to +4 range, and are summed (Rodeghiero et al, J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:2063). Criteria for scoring of each symptom are similar between the two questionnaires, but not identical. Here, we have performed a detailed comparison between PBQ and ISTH-BAT scores in a prospective study of children with mucocutaneous bleeding and/or a family history of VWD or a platelet function disorder referred to our tertiary-care pediatric bleeding disorders clinic. To date, we have enrolled 75 subjects, with a mean age of 9.9 yrs (range: 0.5–17.8 yrs), of whom 36 are males. The median overall PBQ score of these children was 3 (range: 0–12), as was the median overall ISTH-BAT score (range: 0–13). In 37/75 children (49%), the overall PBQ score was identical to the overall ISTH-BAT score. In the majority of these children (34/37; 92%), the individual scores for each symptom were identical. However, in 3 children, there were differences in the individual scores that balanced out, resulting in identical overall scores. For 38/75 children (51%), the overall PBQ and ISTH-BAT scores were different. In the majority of these children (33/38; 87%), the difference between the scores was only 1, with the ISTH-BAT being lower in 19/38 children, and higher in 14/38 children. In 2/38 children, the overall ISTH-BAT was lower by 2, in 2/38, higher by 2 and in 1/38, higher by 3. A lower overall ISTH-BAT score was mainly due to a lower score for cutaneous bleeding symptoms (14/21 children). A higher overall ISTH-BAT score was mainly due to a −1 PBQ score for a child who did not bleed on at least 2 tooth extractions or surgeries (observed in 11/17 children) and/or a higher ISTH-BAT score for menorrhagia (observed in 6/17 children, specifically, 6/9 postmenarchal adolescent females). 10/75 (13%) children had a normal overall PBQ score of 0 or 1 (median: 1). The median overall ISTH-BAT score in these children was also 1 (range: 0–3), but 5 children had a score of 2 or 3. In the remaining 65/75 children (87%) with a positive, abnormal PBQ score, the median score was 3 (range: 2–12), as was the median overall ISTH-BAT score (range: 2–13). In contrast with previous prospective studies using the PBQ/ISTH-BAT in which pediatric-specific symptoms were not observed (Bowman et al, J Thromb Haemost 2009;7:1418; Bidlingmaier et al, J Thromb Haemost 2012;10:1335), 12/75 children (16%) received scores for macroscopic hematuria, post-circumcision bleeding, cephalohematoma, umbilical stump bleeding, post-venipuncture bleeding, or conjunctival hemorrhage. In summary, in this prospective study, we have observed similar, but not identical, overall PBQ and ISTH-BAT scores and the occurrence of pediatric-specific bleeding symptoms in children referred to a tertiary-care bleeding disorders clinic with mucocutaneous bleeding and/or a family history of VWD or platelet dysfunction. Thus, the inclusion of pediatric-specific bleeding symptoms in the standardized questionnaires is useful, and if the ISTH-BAT is to be adopted for general use to aid in the evaluation of whether a child has an underlying bleeding disorder, it will be essential to determine the cut-off for an abnormal ISTH-BAT bleeding score in children <18 yrs of age. Disclosures: James: CSL-Behring, Baxter, Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→