MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980169183 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2019.2946814

Generalized FFT-Based One-Bit Quantization System for Wideband Spectrum Sensing

2019· article· en· W2980169183 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdelmohsen Ali, Walaa Hamouda

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantization (signal processing)Fast Fourier transformComputer scienceWidebandElectronic engineeringAsynchronous communicationFalse alarmAlgorithmTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we maximize the benefits from the ultra low power wideband sensing approach based on FFT-based 1-bit quantization by addressing the practical limitations to this method. Unlike the conventional architecture that assumes a fully synchronized and coordinated Primary User (PU) network, the proposed system relaxes these limitations by providing an analytical framework for an uncoordinated asynchronous FFT-based 1-bit quantization system. For this system, we analytically derive the sub-band power which is the main parameter for the closed-form expressions representing the false alarm and detection probabilities. Further, improving the system performance through cooperative sensing is considered. While respecting the decision fusion cooperation, the optimum threshold for the generalized FFT-based 1-bit quantization system is derived such that the aggregate error rate is minimized. In addition to its significant power and complexity reduction, the presented analysis expands the use of the FFT-based 1-bit quantization wideband sensing approach in practical deployments. The sensing performance and the analytical results are assessed through comparisons with respective results from computer simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207