MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980183981 · doi:10.1145/3355402.3355419

Human Action Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Network and Depth Sensor Data

2019· article· en· W2980183981 on OpenAlex
Zeeshan Ahmad, Kandasamy Illanko, Naimul Khan, D. Androutsos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePoolingData setAction recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Set (abstract data type)Computer visionTraining set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper proposes a technique for Human Action Recognition (HAR) that uses a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Depth data sequences from the motion sensing devices are converted into images and fed into a CNN rather than using any conventional or statistical method. The initial data was obtained from 10 actions performed by six subjects captured by the Kinect v2 sensor as well as 20 actions performed by 7 subjects from the MSR 3D Action data set. A custom CNN architecture consisting of three convolutional and three max pooling layers followed by a fully connected layer was used. Training, validation, and testing was carried out on a total of 39715 images. An accuracy of 97.23% was achieved on the Kinect data set. On the MSR data set the accuracy was 87.1%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207