MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Outcome of Advanced Stage Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NLPHL) Compared to Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (CHL): A Matched Pair Analysis

2012· article· en· W2980185927 on OpenAlexaff
Katharine He Xing, Joseph M. Connors, Mubarak Al‐Μansour, Randy D. Gascoyne, Brian Skinnider, Kerry J. Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStage (stratigraphy)LymphomaMedicineInternal medicineClassical Hodgkin lymphomaOncologyHodgkin lymphomaFollicular lymphomaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1531 Background: Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) constitutes 5% of all Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and with only 20% presenting with advanced stage, there are limited data regarding the optimal management and long-term outcome. We previously reported a moderate risk of transformation to NLPHL to aggressive lymphoma evaluating all stages and advanced stage disease and spleen involvement emerged as risk factors (Al-Mansour et al., JCO, 2010). Herein, we evaluated the outcome and transformation risk of advanced stage NLPHL (stage IIB, III or IV) and compared to a cohort of matched historical controls with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Methods: We screened the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database to identify all patients with NLPHL diagnosed between 1970 and 2011 by the WHO classification with prior pathological review. For each patient treated with curative intent (n=41), 2:1 matched controls with cHL were identified with matching by age (12–30, 31–45, 46–60, >60 y), gender, stage, decade of diagnosis, mass size (<10 cm or ≥10 cm) and treatment received. Lymphoma progression-free survival (LyPFS) was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of lymphoma recurrence (NLPHL or transformation to aggressive lymphoma), or death due to acute treatment toxicity, HL or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) events included relapses from NLPHL and death due to acute treatment toxicity or HL. Overall survival (OS) and time to transformation (TTT) were as previously defined (Al-Mansour et al., JCO, 2010). Results: 42 patients with advanced stage NLPHL were identified. Characteristics: median age 37 y; male, 71%; stage III disease, 90%; good performance status (PS≤1), 88%; non-bulky disease (<10cm), 100%. All cases had an IPSS score < 4, and 14 (34%) had splenic involvement. Most patients received ABVD-(like) chemotherapy (83%). With a median follow-up of 10 y (range 1.2–35.6 y), the 5, 10 and 15 year OS were 89%, 86% and 76% respectively, and the LyPFS was 72%, 63% and 44% respectively. The FFTF, reflecting NLPHL relapses, at 5, 10, 15 years was 84%, 76% and 53%, respectively. In total, 20 (48%) patients relapsed with lymphoma. At first relapse, 12(60%) had NLPHL and 8 (40%), aggressive NHL. For the 12 NLPHL relapses, 1 later developed aggressive NHL, and 8 developed a second NLPHL relapse. In univariate analysis, poor PS (>2) was associated with a reduced LyPFS (p=0.042) and there was a trend towards excess relapses with spleen involvement (p=0.081). The median TTT was 5.45 y (range 0.3–20.3 y) and the risk of transformation at 5, 10, 15, 20 years was 12%, 15%, 20% and 30% respectively. The OS in ever-transformed versus never-transformed cases was 96% vs 67% at 5 y (p=0.123). Spleen involvement (25 y TTT 65% vs 8.5%, p=0.014, Figure 1) and mass size ≥5cm (p=0.003) at initial presentation were identified as risk factors for transformation. Risk factors for relapse with NLPHL were male sex (p=0.026), mass size < 5cm (p=0.038), and PS ≥2 (p=0.001) but notably, spleen involvement was not a risk factor (p=0.699). There was a trend towards increased risk of NLPHL relapse for patients receiving non-ABVD regimens (MOPP+/−RT n=3; RT n=2) (10 y FFTF 80% vs 17%, p=0.086). For the matched control analysis, 82 patients with cHL were identified (80% NScHL), with a median follow-up time of 8.5 y (range 1.1 y – 26 y). Most cHL patients had an IPSS score < 4 (94%) and 41% had spleen involvement. The OS was similar in NLPHL and cHL (15 y OS 76% vs 67%, p=0.5808). There was a trend towards a superior LyPFS for patients with cHL vs NLPHL, 72% vs 44% at 15 years (p=0.096, Figure 2), respectively, but similar FFTF (p=0.930), reflecting an absence of transformation events in cHL. There were more late (> 5 y) lymphoma relapses in NLPHL (HL and NHL) compared to patients with cHL (45% vs 10%, p=0.01). Conclusion: With long-term follow-up, almost half of the patients with NLPHL develop a lymphoma relapse and large proportion experience transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Splenic involvement is a strong risk factor for eventual development of aggressive lymphoma providing a rationale for CHOP +/− rituximab based chemotherapy. Although the OS of NLPHL is comparable to cHL, there is an inherent increased risk of transformation and late relapses, highlighting a distinct disease behaviour and the need for repeat biopsy at relapse as well as long-term surveillance. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→