MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980196141 · doi:10.1109/sege.2019.8859787

A Network of BIMGs Participating in Demand Response Using EVs and HVAC Units

2019· article· en· W2980196141 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ehsan Rezaei, Hanane Dagdougui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHVACPhotovoltaic systemApartmentRenewable energyDemand responseAutomotive engineeringBuilding automationElectric power systemBuilding management systemGridAir conditioningComputer scienceEngineeringArchitectural engineeringControl (management)Power (physics)Electrical engineeringElectricityCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed energy resources, energy storage systems, photo-voltaic(PV) systems, and electric vehicles charging systems are being increasingly installed in many residential units. This paper presents an optimal power management mechanism for a network of grid-connected buildings integrated with microgrids. The current paper attempts to propose a high-level centralized control problem for apartment-buildings, where each building includes on-roof photovoltaic power unit, stationary local batteries, residential apartments and EVs. We developed a model predictive control for apartment-building energy management system, which controls the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, and the electric vehicles. The solution aims to dynamically control the power demand in the building by properly controlling each apartment HVAC in the network in order to improve the matching performance between the renewable power generation and consumption in the network of BIMGs and minimize the power exchange with the main grid. The problem is solved for a network of multi-unit apartments building in Montreal area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207