Inflammatory Markers and Autoantibodies That Correlate with Early and Late Onset of New Onset Pediatric Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGVHD) has previously been characterized by elevation of a number of inflammatory markers and autoantibodies. We hypothesized that evaluation of such markers would contribute to a biological classification of new onset cGVHD in children and possibly aid in early diagnosis. The COG study ASCT0031 is a phase III cGVHD therapeutic trial that included the biological evaluation of 52 newly diagnosed cGVHD pts and 34 time-matched post BMT control patients (2 – 18 yrs) with no clinical evidence of cGVHD. Chronic GVHD was divided into an early onset between 3 to 8 mos post BMT (n=37, mean 5.7, range 3 – 8 months ) and late onset ≥9 months post BMT (n=15, mean 14.3, range 9 to 30 months) groups and 34 non-cGVHD controls evaluated at 6 and 12 months. Soluble B-cell activating factor (sBAFF), soluble IL-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2Ralpha), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), IL-6, anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-mitochondrial antibody and anti-cardiolipin antibody were evaluated by sandwich ELISA. We found an increased level of sBAFF in cGVHD patients with both early (7.2± 5.3 vs. 3.7 ± 2.5 ng/mL, p = 0.008, t-test) and late (3.2 ± 2.7 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 ng/mL, p = 0.04) onset cGVHD compared with controls. Although the anti-dsDNA concentrations were considered to be in the normal range, they were significantly higher in both early (2.4 ± 2.5 vs. 0.1±0.3 IU/mL; p < 0.0001) and late (4.1 ± 3.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.3 IU/mL; p < 0.0001) cGVHD compared to non-cGVHD controls. We found that early onset cGVHD compared to patients without cGVHD at 6 months had an elevation in sIL-2Ralpha (10.1±5.4 vs. 7.0±3.4 pg/mL; p < 0.0001) but not in late onset cGVHD. ANA, TGF-beta, IFNalpha, IL-6, MCP-1, and anti-cardiolipin antibodies were not associated with new onset cGVHD. Acute GVHD, a major factor for the development of cGVHD, did not correlate with any of the three markers. We found that the ANA (2.3±2.1 vs. 0.9±0.7 absorbance ratio, p = 0.0004) and anti-dsDNA (anti-dsDNA; 3.8±2.9 vs. 2.4±2.5 IU/mL, p = 0.04) were significantly elevated in de novo onset cGVHD patients compared to those with previous acute GVHD. Soluble BAFF and sIL-2Ralpha are associated with Th1 responses and B cell activation/expansion, whereas anti-dsDNA is associated with specific B cell responses. The elevation of sBAFF and sIL-2Ralpha are consistent with both high levels of T cell and B cell activation as part of early cGVHD. The association of later onset cGVHD with only sBAFF and anti-dsDNA suggests that B cell activation is more predominant in that setting and is consistent with our previous observation of an association of cGVHD with activated Toll-like receptor 9 expressing B cells. These findings suggest early and late cGVHD may be classified by different patterns of T and B cell activation. Early onset cGVHD (3–8 mo. Post BMT) Late Onset cGVHD (>=9 mo. post BMT) Marker cGVHD (N=37) No cGVHD at 6 mo. (N=26) p value cGVHD (N=14) No cGVHD at 12 mo. (N=15) p value Anti-dsDNA (IU/mL) 2.4±2.5 0.1±0.3 <0.001 4.1±3.1 0.2 ± 0.3 <0.001 sBAFF (ng/mL) 7.2± 5.3 3.7 ± 2.5 0.008 3.2 ± 2.7 1.5 ± 0.8 0.04 sIL-2Ralpha (pg/mL) 10.1±5.4 7.0±3.4 <0.001 6.9±3.3 5.6±3.7 NS
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".