MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980212906

The Founding of the Front de Liberation du Quebec and the Events that Led to the October Crisis of 1970

2006· article· en· W2980212906 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melanie M. Garcia

Bibliographic record

VenueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFront (military)Political scienceLiberationEconomic historyHistoryGeographyMeteorologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The FLQ, a Marxist group founded in 1963, sought to overthrow the Quebec provincial government and establish an independent Quebec. From 1963 to 1970 the FLQ committed over 200 acts of political violence, including bank hold-ups and bombings that caused at least three deaths. The FLQ is best known for the October crisis of 1970 which involved the kidnapping of a British diplomat and Canadian politician, who was later murdered. This paper examined the Canadian government's response to the FLQ political violence between 1963 and 1970, and demonstrated how the failure of the government to take the FLQ seriously led to the October 1970 events of political kidnapping and murder. Resources used in this study included Canadian parliamentary debates, newspapers from Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, and Quebec, memoirs and autobiographies of political leaders and participants, contemporary reports, and biographic and other secondary scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207