MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980219486 · doi:10.1113/jp278612

Differential impact of two critical respiratory centres in opioid‐induced respiratory depression in awake mice

2019· article· en· W2980219486 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienn G. Varga, Brandon T. Reid, Brigitte L. Kieffer, Erica S. Levitt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsRespiratory systemOpioidRespiratory rateBrainstemMedicineAnesthesiaRespiratory failureDepression (economics)MorphinePharmacologyNeuroscienceReceptorInternal medicineBiologyHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: The main cause of death from opioid overdose is respiratory depression due to the activation of µ-opioid receptors (MORs). We conditionally deleted MORs from neurons in two key areas of the brainstem respiratory circuitry (the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus (KF) and pre-Bötzinger complex (preBötC)) to determine their role in opioid-induced respiratory disturbances in adult, awake mice. Deletion of MORs from KF neurons attenuated respiratory rate depression at all doses of morphine. Deletion of MORs from preBötC neurons attenuated rate depression at the low dose, but had no effect on rate following high doses of morphine. Instead, high doses of morphine increased the occurrence of apnoeas. The results indicate that opioids affect distributed key areas of the respiratory network in a dose-dependent manner and countering the respiratory effects of high dose opioids via the KF may be an effective approach to combat overdose. ABSTRACT: The primary cause of death from opioid overdose is respiratory failure. High doses of opioids cause severe rate depression and increased risk of fatal apnoea, which correlate with increasing irregularities in breathing pattern. µ-Opioid receptors (MORs) are widely distributed throughout the brainstem respiratory network, but the mechanisms underlying respiratory depression are poorly understood. The medullary pre-Bötzinger complex (preBötC) and the pontine Kölliker-Fuse nucleus (KF) are considered critical for inducing opioid-related respiratory disturbances. We used a conditional knockout approach to investigate the roles and relative contribution of MORs in KF and preBötC neurons in opioid-induced respiratory depression in awake adult mice. The results revealed dose-dependent and region-specific opioid effects on the control of both respiratory rate and pattern. Respiratory depression induced by an anti-nociceptive dose of morphine was significantly attenuated following deletion of MORs from either the KF or the preBötC, suggesting cumulative network effects on respiratory rate control at low opioid doses. Deletion of MORs from KF neurons also relieved rate depression at near-maximal respiratory depressant doses of morphine. Meanwhile, deletion of MORs from the preBötC had no effect on rate following administration of high doses of morphine. Instead, a severe ataxic breathing pattern emerged with many apnoeas. We conclude that opioids affect distributed areas of the respiratory network and opioid-induced respiratory depression cannot be attributed to only one area in isolation. However, countering the effects of near maximal respiratory depressant doses of opioids in the KF may be a powerful approach to combat opioid overdose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations133
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207