MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980223664 · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8857118

PCA-Based Channel Selection in High-Density EMG for Improving Force Estimation

2019· article· en· W2980223664 on OpenAlexaff
Gelareh Hajian, Evelyn Morin, Ali Etemad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrachioradialisPrincipal component analysisComputer scienceBicepsPattern recognition (psychology)Isometric exerciseArtificial intelligenceIndependent component analysisFrequency domainChannel (broadcasting)Speech recognitionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a method for selecting channels to improve estimated force using fast orthogonal search (FOS) has been proposed. Surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals acquired from linear surface electrode arrays, placed on the long head and short head of biceps brachii, and brachioradialis during isometric contractions are used to estimate force induced at the wrist using the FOS algorithm. The method utilizes principle component analysis (PCA) in the frequency domain to select the channels with the highest contribution to the first principal component (PC). Our analysis demonstrates that our proposed method is capable of reducing the dimensionality of the data (the number of channels was reduced from 21 to 9) while improving the accuracy of the estimated force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→