Shape, Pose and Density Statistical Model for 3D Reconstruction of Articulated Structures from X-Ray Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article proposes a joint statistical model, to describe the volumetric shape + pose + density information, and a reconstruction algorithm to simultaneously recover the volumetric information of several anatomical structures from biplanar radiographs. A PCA-based representation is proposed as compact model representation and a hybrid AAM search and genetic optimization is used to perform the reconstruction. A study was conducted to recover a 3D volume grid containing a human knee mesh from 2 orthogonal simulated radiographs. The model was computed on a data set of 200 subjects and the reconstruction test was performed on 18 subjects, leading to a surface distance RMSE of 0.7 ± 0.31 mm for the distal femur, 0.9 ± 0.3 mm for the proximal tibia and 0.8 ± 0.3 mm for the fibula. These results demonstrate the feasibility and the pertinence of the proposed approach, the next step being its application in a clinical context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".