Investigation of a 256‐Monopole Transmit Antenna Array for Over‐the‐Horizon Radar in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A 256‐monopole planar array is investigated as a potential transmit antenna covering the entire 3‐ to 18‐MHz band in an over‐the‐horizon radar (OTHR) operating at high latitudes in Canada. This array is relatively inexpensive, simple to build, and offers the azimuth and elevation resolutions necessary to defeat the auroral clutter which has traditionally limited the operation of OTHR at high latitudes. It is demonstrated that excellent clutter rejection ratios are possible with this antenna array and accurate calibration, but significant performance degradation occurs with calibration errors in particular in the lower portion of the operating frequency band. Various calibration approaches and error mechanisms are studied. A new approach combining multiple‐input‐multiple‐output (MIMO) radar techniques at lower frequencies and conventional transmit null steering at higher frequencies is proposed and evaluated. This approach enhances the robustness of the array to calibration errors while preserving the radar unambiguous range‐Doppler space across the operating frequency band.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it