MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980251574 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2019.8861796

A Low Power and Low Noise Voltage-Controlled Oscillator in 28-nm FDSOI Technology for Wireless Communication Applications

2019· article· en· W2980251574 on OpenAlexaff
Abdul Baseer Khan, Jaime Cardenas, Li Chen, Muhammad R. Khan, Aqeel A. Qureshi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsdBcPhase noiseVoltage-controlled oscillatorElectrical engineeringCMOSFigure of meritDissipationMaterials scienceVoltageElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 28-nm CMOS (FDSOI) technology is used to design and simulate the VCO presented in this paper. The tuning range of the proposed design is from 0.309 GHz to 2.92 GHz (about 161.75% tuning) with the power dissipation of 3.73 mW, at a supply voltage of 1V. In the frequency range from 0.309 to 2.92 GHz, the lowest phase noise result is -126.53 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from centered oscillating frequency of 1.613 GHz. These results lead to an excellent Figure of Merit (FoM) of -184.97 dBc/Hz. A variable bias current approach is used to control the oscillation frequency. Current mirror circuit has been used to maintain wide tuning range, low power dissipation and reasonable low phase noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207