Fully Automated Segmentation of Alveolar Bone Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks from Intraoral Ultrasound Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delineation of alveolar bone aids the diagnosis and treatment of periodontal diseases. In current practice, conventional 2D radiography and 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging are used as the non-invasive approaches to image and delineate alveolar bone structures. Recently, high-frequency ultrasound imaging is proposed as an alternative to conventional imaging methods to prevent the harmful effects of ionizing radiation. However, the manual delineation of alveolar bone from ultrasound imaging is time-consuming and subject to inter and intraobserver variability. This study proposes to use a convolutional neural network-based machine learning framework to automatically segment the alveolar bone from ultrasound images. The proposed method consists of a homomorphic filtering based noise reduction and a u-net machine learning framework for automated delineation. The proposed method was evaluated over 15 ultrasound images of tooth acquired from procine specimens. The comparisons against manual ground truth delineations performed by three experts in terms of mean Dice score and Hausdorff distance values demonstrate that the proposed method yielded an improved performance over a recent state of the art graph cuts based method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".