MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980260200 · doi:10.1177/0957155819861034

Visibility graphs and blindspots: Wajdi Mouawad’s <i>Incendies</i> and its mathematical poetics

2019· article· en· W2980260200 on OpenAlex
Catherine Khordoc

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Cultural Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilityPoeticsTheme (computing)NarrativeIdentity (music)BrotherMechanism (biology)EpistemologySociologyAestheticsLiteraturePhilosophyArtComputer sciencePoetryAnthropologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the use of mathematics in the 2003 play Incendies by the Lebanese–Québécois playwright Wajdi Mouawad. Mathematics functions not only as a theme in the play, but also as a mechanism that enables the main characters to decipher the mysteries surrounding their identity which are revealed in their deceased mother’s will. In their reluctant quest to find a father and a brother that are unknown to them, the twins Jeanne and Simon discover the unsettling truth that the two are actually one person, in part by turning to number theory and visibility graphs. This article argues that the mathematical dimensions of the play serve as a mise en abyme of its narrative structure and its Oedipian conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it