MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980266395 · doi:10.4324/9780429039119-14

Controlling the Proliferation of Missiles

2019· book-chapter· en· W2980266395 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Lise Hartman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNuclear Issues and Defense
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAeronauticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter provides an overview of a number of issues involved in assessing some of the uses and dangers involved in the proliferation of ballistic missiles and evaluates the efforts to control their spread. One of the questions that constantly arises is the military significance of ballistic missiles as compared with other forms of weapons delivery, particularly aircraft. In terms of pay load, aircraft typically carry greater and more diversified ordnance, especially of nuclear and chemical weapons. In terms of accuracy, most Third World missiles are very inaccurate compared with those in the industrialized world. In 1982 the Reagan administration instituted the NSDD-70, which comprised an examination of the ways in which ballistic missiles might be controlled. This culminated the following year in negotiations between the United States and Canada, Italy, France, Japan and the United Kingdom essentially to formulate the Missile Technology Control Regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Issues and DefenseFrench-language works237,207