LA MODERNITÉ DANS LES ÉTUDES THÉÂTRALES AU QUÉBEC, AU CANADA ET AUX ÉTATS-UNIS1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les études théâtrales québécoises sont le lieu de débats et de tensions multiples depuis plusieurs années qui résultent, pour une part, de l’emplacement géographique et culturel particulier qu’elles occupent entre l’Europe et l’Amérique du Nord. Cette étude se propose de cerner le paysage épistémologique de la discipline au Québec en examinant un corpus d’écrits issus de trois communautés savantes portant sur la question de la modernité. Au regard du traitement réservé à cette question par des chercheurs québécois, canadiens et américains, l’analyse tente de retracer le développement de ce domaine de recherche depuis son établissement dans les années 1980 et de nommer les défis qui l’attendent dans un contexte de décloisonnement disciplinaire et d’érosion du théâtre comme référence commune au sein de la culture québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".