Fuzzy Logic Algorithms to Identify Birds, Precipitation, and Ground Clutter in S-Band Radar Data Using Polarimetric and Nonpolarimetric Variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The statistical properties of the radar echoes from biological, precipitation, and ground targets observed with the McGill S-band dual-polarization radar have been used to devise a polarimetric and a nonpolarimetric fuzzy logic algorithm for pixel-by-pixel target identification. Radar observations of migrating birds show distinctly different polarimetric features during their relative approach and departure from the radar site illustrating the dependency of radar parameters on the canting angle and scattering cross section. The devised algorithms have been tested with two independent events, each consisting of 2 h of radar observations with a 5-min temporal resolution. One event consisted of precipitation without birds while the other contained only birds. The misclassifications were 10.12% and 9.6%, respectively, for the two cases for the nonpolarimetric algorithm, and 1.99% and 0.92% for the polarimetric algorithm. The results indicate that even though nonpolarimetric radar membership functions may be considered adequate for separating radar echo returns from birds, precipitation, and ground targets, they are not sufficiently skilled if a greater accuracy is required. Target identification without polarimetric variables especially fails in the region of zero isodop and in precipitation with an echo top below 4 km.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".