MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase I Study of the PARP1-2 Inhibitor Veliparib in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2012· article· en· W2980301843 on OpenAlexaff
Paola Neri, Peter Duggan, Kathy Gratton, Li Ren, Jordan Johnson, Jiří Slabý, Douglas A. Stewart, Jonathan J. Keats, Nizar J. Bahlis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeliparibBortezomibPARP inhibitorMedicineProteasome inhibitorMultiple myelomaInternal medicineIxazomibPharmacologyCarfilzomibPlasma cell leukemiaOncologyTolerabilityCancer researchAdverse effectPoly ADP ribose polymeraseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1862 Background: Targeting deregulated DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways has lead to the discovery of novel therapeutics that result in contextual synthetic lethality such as poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibition in tumors with homozygous loss of BRCA1/2 genes. We have recently shown that inhibition of the 26S proteasome induces a “BRCAness” state in myeloma (MM) cells and sensitizes them to the PARP inhibitor Veliparib by blocking homology-mediated repair of DNA breaks (Neri P, Blood 2011). The results of these studies are the subject of this phase I clinical trial combining bortezomib with Veliparib in relapsed and/or refractory MM (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01495351). Methods: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety, tolerability and MTD of Veliparib in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone; secondary objectives included pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenomic studies for an in vivo assessment of Veliparib effect on PARP activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and sorted CD138 bone marrow plasma cells and to determine expression levels and genomic aberrations of DDR genes in MM cells. Adults with an ECOG 0 to 2, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function were eligible. Patients previously refractory to bortezomib were allowed on trial as long as they didn't progress on bortezomib in their last line of therapy. Patients received oral Veliparib on days 1 to 14, bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (20 mg) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles followed by 6 maintenance cycles where bortezomib and dexamethasone are given weekly. Veliparib dose escalation, from a starting dose of 20 mg PO bid, followed a modified Fibonacci dose escalation scheme based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria. Results: At data cut-off (August 2012), MM patients were enrolled and treated at the 20, 40 and 60 mg PO bid of Veliparib. The median age is 61 (47–78), median time from diagnosis 6 years (1.4- 7.4), median creatinine: 69 umol/l (56–110), albumin 37 g/l (32–42), β2: 3 mg/l (1.64–6.11), ISS stage II or IIII in 50%. Median number of prior therapy: 3 (1–9) with prior ASCT in 87.5%, prior thalidomide in 25%, prior lenalidomide 75%, prior pomalidomide 12.5% and prior bortezomib 62.5% (refractory 37.5%, relapsed 25%). FISH studies revealed del 17p in 37.5% and one with t(14,16). Patients completed a median of 5 cycles (range 1–9) with treatment ongoing in six patients. No DLT was encountered and the MTD has not yet been reached with the current cohort receiving 60 mg PO bid of Veliparib. Grade 3–4 AEs in all cycles included transient thrombocytopenia grade 3 in 37.5%; grade 3 anemia in 12.5%. Other grade 3 non-hematological toxicities included diarrhea in 12.5%; sensory neuropathy grade 1 in 37.5% with only one patient developing grade 2 neuropathy. Median time to response was 15 days (range 13–36), response to therapy included sCR + CR + nCR in 37.5%, VGPR+PR in 12.5%, MR in 37.5%, for an overall response rate ≥PR in 50% and ≥MR in 87.5%. With a median follow-up of 4 months (range 1.7–6.7), Kaplan-Meyer estimates for PFS and OS at 8 months were 70% and 80% respectively. In order to determine the biologically optimal dose (BOD) of Veliparib in vivo correlative studies included the measurements of PARP activity (poly-ADP-ribose or PAR levels) in PBMCs and sorted CD138+ cells. The median PAR levels in PBMCs for patients treated with 20 mg Veliparib on pre-treatment day 1, post-treatment day 4 and day 11 were 3413, 951.3 and 1111.6 pg/107 cells respectively (reduction of 67.4 %). At the 40 mg level, PBMCs PAR levels on days 1, 4 and 11 were 1268.25, 251 and 111.3 pg/107 cells (91.2% reduction). In sorted CD138+ cells, at the 40 mg dose level, the median PAR levels were 2771.3 (day1 pre-treatment), 249.6 and 360 (days 4 and 11 post-treatment) pg/107cells with an 87% reduction. Other biological studies, including analysis of RNA sequenome in CD138 cells pre- and post-treatment are undergoing. Conclusions: Veliparib administered orally in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone appears to be well tolerated with evidence of significant anti-tumor activity in relapsed or refractory MM patients. PARP1-2 inhibition is confirmed in MM cells in vivo and further dose escalation of Veliparib continues to determine the MTD of this combination. Disclosures: Neri: Johnson ans Johnson: Research Funding. Keats:Tgen: Employment. Bahlis:Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207