MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Multiple Myeloma in Manitoba: A Population Based Study.

2007· article· en· W2980314982 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Szwajcer, M.D. Seftel, Erin Dupont, Morel Rubinger, Brent Schacter

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationMultiple myelomaSurgeryCohortPopulationIncidence (geometry)Retrospective cohort studyCohort studyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: We reviewed outcomes for all Manitoba myeloma patients 1993–2006 treated conventionally or with high dose therapy followed by stem cell transplantation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken where all individuals with a diagnosis of MM (ICD-O-3) were identified within the CancerCare Manitoba (CCMB) Registry and the Manitoba Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant (MBMT) Registry. Complete incidence, mortality and demographic data are available for all patients in the CCMB registry and complete staging, transplant characteristics and outcome data are available for individuals in the MBMT registry. A multivariate model was used to explore predictors of outcome for the entire cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare those who have and who have not undergone transplantation, as well as to compare those who have undergone autologous (autoSCT) versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Results: 771 pts were diagnosed with MM. Incidence rates of MM over the last decade have remained stable. Age and sex adjusted rates (per 105) were 6.6 and 4.5 for males and females respectively. Median age of the cohort was 69, whereas the median age of those who have undergone transplantation is 54. 78 pts underwent autoSCT and 11 underwent alloSCT, with the majority of transplants performed after 2001. As a fraction of total transplants performed per year, MM transplant rates have remained stable since 2002 at 29%. Six pts have undergone sequential transplants for relapse or progression. Median overall survival for those undergoing transplantation is 5.2 years compared to 3 years for those not transplanted (p<0.01). On multivariate analysis, for the entire cohort, undergoing transplantation was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 0.39 (CI 0.25–0.6), while being 70 or above was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 1.45 (CI 1.12–1.87). For those who have undergone transplantation median overall survival was not affected by transplant type, age at transplant (< or ≥ 60), or disease status prior to transplantation (log-rank test p>0.05). Conclusions: In this population based analysis, utilization of stem cell transplantation provides a survival benefit to patients with MM. For those eligible for autoSCT, disease status prior to transplantation does not affect outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→