MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

« L’affaire Zimmermann ». À propos des influences bolzaniennes dans l’École de Lvov et de Varsovie

2005· book-chapter· fr· W2980353145 on OpenAlexaff
Wioletta Miśkiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1910, à Cracovie, Jan Łukasiewicz publie un travail consacré à la logique d’Aristote : O zasadzie sprzecznosci u Arystotelesa (Du principe de contradiction chez Aristote) où il analyse le principe de contradiction du point de vue logique, ontologique et psychologique. En étudiant Métaphysique gamma, Łukasiewicz arrive à la conclusion que ce principe selon lequel personne ne peut croire être une chose et son contraire, qui est si souvent confondu avec le principe d’identité (« une chose n’e...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207