Vision-Based Heart and Respiratory Rate Monitoring During Sleep – A Validation Study for the Population at Risk of Sleep Apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A reliable, accessible, and non-intrusive method for tracking respiratory and heart rate is important for improving monitoring and detection of sleep apnea. In this study, an algorithm based on motion analysis of infrared video recordings was validated in 50 adults referred for clinical overnight polysomnography (PSG). The algorithm tracks the displacements of selected feature points on each sleeping participant and extracts respiratory rate using principal component analysis and heart rate using independent component analysis. For respiratory rate estimation (mean ± standard deviation), 89.89 % ± 10.95 % of the overnight estimation was accurate within 1 breath per minute compared to the PSG-derived respiratory rate from the respiratory inductive plethysmography signal, with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.10 ± 1.64 breaths per minute. For heart rate estimation, 77.97 % ± 18.91 % of the overnight estimation was within 5 beats per minute of the heart rate derived from the pulse oximetry signal from PSG, with mean RMSE of 7.47 ± 4.79 beats per minute. No significant difference in estimation of RMSE of either signal was found according to differences in body position, sleep stage, or amount of the body covered by blankets. This vision-based method may prove suitable for overnight, non-contact monitoring of respiratory rate. However, at present, heart rate monitoring is less reliable and will require further work to improve accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".