MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980448774

LA LIMITATION DE RESPONSABILITÉ EN DROIT MARITIME CANADIEN ET LES CRÉANCES DES PASSAGERS ET AUTRES ACTEURS MARITIMES

2019· article· fr· W2980448774 on OpenAlexaffabout
André Braën, Marel Katsivela

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Bar Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, logistics, and international trade
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)LiabilityTortLegislationLawCrewBusinessPolitical scienceLaw and economicsEngineeringSociologyComputer scienceAeronautics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The principle of limitation of liability applies to many actors in the marine industry. It is the focus of some of the international conventions that Canada has incorporated into its maritime law. These documents specify the scope of application of limitation of liability, the beneficiaries and the cases of exclusion. The authors analyze the application of this principle in Canadian maritime law with respect to losses incurred by passengers, crew members and other employees of a shipowner or carrier, as well as losses incurred by other maritime actors such as fishers and pilots. But as the principle of limitation is an important aspect of maritime tort liability, the authors start by outlining the difficulties that arise from the application of Canadian maritime law, both at the constitutional level and in terms of identifying the applicable legislation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Bar ReviewSame topicLaw, logistics, and international tradeFrench-language works237,207