MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980492133 · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b15445

Multifunctional Silica–Silicone Nanocomposite with Regenerative Superhydrophobic Capabilities

2019· article· en· W2980492133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanocompositeSiliconeNanotechnologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superhydrophobic surfaces have been garnering increased interest because of their adaptive characteristics. However, concerns regarding their durability and complex fabrication techniques have limited their widespread adoption. In our study, we have developed an effective, durable, and versatile silica-silicone nanocomposite that can be applied through spray coating or bulk synthesized as superhydrophobic monoliths through a facile, economic, and scalable fabrication technique. For spray-coated samples, superhydrophobicity was achieved for concentrations above 9%. However, poor adhesion was observed for concentrations above 20%. Through extensive surface morphology studies, it was determined that a delicate balance between the polymer and dispersed superhydrophobic silica nanoparticles exists at a concentration of 14%. This concentration is necessary for developing the desired hierarchical structure and providing sufficient adhesion with the substrate. The monoliths were fabricated into complex geometries, with superhydrophobicity being observed in the 5 and 9% specimens. The hierarchical structure was formed through controlled surface abrasion, which created the microscale roughness and concurrently exposed the embedded silica nanoparticles. It was found that a monolith with a concentration of 9% provides excellent water repellency as well as a suitable emulsion viscosity to facilitate the molding process. Though compressive loading (up to 10 MPa) damages the monolith, the superhydrophobic performance can be quickly restored through abrasive layer removal. Both spray-coated and monolith specimens retained their superhydrophobicity after being subjected to high temperatures (up to 350 °C) and corrosive environments (pH 1-13) for 2 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it