MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980494534 · doi:10.1002/cne.24794

Sensory cutaneous papillae in the sea lamprey (<i>Petromyzon marinus</i> L.): II. Ontogeny and immunocytochemical characterization of solitary chemosensory cells

2019· article· en· W2980494534 on OpenAlexafffund
Tina E. Suntres, Gheylen Daghfous, Sirinart Ananvoranich, Réjean Dubuc, Barbara S. Zielinski

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéGreat Lakes Fishery Commission
KeywordsLampreyPetromyzonBiologyAnatomyOntogenyJuvenileEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solitary chemosensory cells (SCCs) and their innervating fibers are located in the respiratory system of many vertebrates, including papillae on lamprey gill pores. In order to gain stronger insight for the role of these chemosensory cells, we examined immunocytochemical and innervation characteristics, as well as abundance at the different stages of the lamprey life cycle. The SCCs were distinguished from the surrounding epithelial cells by calretinin and phospholipase C140 immunoreactivity. Nerve fibers extended into the gill pore papillae, as far as the SCCs and serotonergic fibers extended from the underlying dermis into the papillar base. Gill pore papillae were absent and SCCs were sparse during the larval stage and in newly transformed lamprey. Few SCCs were located on small nub-like papillae during the parasitic juvenile stage, but SCCs were abundant on prominent papillae in migrating and in spawning adults. These findings show similarities between the SCCs in lampreys and other vertebrates and suggest that gill SCC function may be important during the feeding juvenile and the adult stages of the lamprey life cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207