MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980498207 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-115075

Donor-Specific Isoagglutinin Clearance in ABO Mismatched Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: How Long Should It Normally Take?

2018· article· en· W2980498207 on OpenAlexaff
John Aneke, Nayana Sondi, Santhosh Thyagu, Christine Cserti‐Gazdewich, Jacob Pendergrast

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsABO blood group systemMedicineTransplantationIsoantibodiesImmunologyInternal medicineAntibodyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: In patients undergoing ABO-incompatible stem cell transplants, recipient isoagglutinins with specificity for donor antigens are expected to slowly become undetectable during the post-transplant period, presumably secondary to the loss of recipient plasma cells via either conditioning chemotherapy or graft-versus-host-disease. Conversely, the persistence or return of these anti-donor isoagglutinins may induce hemolytic anemia or pure red cell aplasia, and may even signify disease relapse. In order to define the expected time to clearance of these donor isoagglutinins at our institution, a retrospective study was performed Methods: The transfusion records of all major-side or bidirectionally ABO-incompatible stem cell transplants performed at an academic cancer hospital between May 2009 and July 2018 were reviewed. Patients without detectable anti-donor isoagglutinins at time of transplant were excluded. Isoagglutinin clearance was defined as non-reactivity of patient plasma against donor-type reverse grouping cells occurring during the post-transplant period; relapse was defined as a 2+ or stronger reaction after one or more non-reactive results Results: A total of 280 patients were included in analysis, of which 44 were native group A, 42 group B and 194 group O. Average age was 52 (±13) years and 130 (46%) were female. Compatibility samples were sent to the UHN blood bank during the post-transplant period for a median of 156 days (IQR 74-370 days). During this time period, donor-targeting/host-derived isoagglutinin clearance was documented in 192 (69%) patients at a median of 48 days (IQR 23-116.5) post-transplant. Of these, 52 (30%) experienced a subsequent return of reactivity at a median 98 days post-transplant (IQR 54-216). Amongst the 128 patients with at least 28 days of post-transplant monitoring and no return of previously cleared isoagglutinins, the median time to clearance was 60 days (IQR 26.5 - 127.5 days). There was no statistically significant difference in time to isoagglutinin clearance between those with and without a subsequent return of reactivity, and time to durable clearance did not correlate with patient age, sex or native ABO group. Conclusions: Amongst patients undergoing major-side or bidirectionally ABO incompatible stem cell transplants, the majority will have cleared their donor-specific isoagglutinins within 120 days of stem cell infusion, although this does not guarantee against later return of reactivity. Thus, the persistence of donor-specific isoagglutinins beyond 120 days post-transplant, or the subsequent return of previously cleared isoagglutinins, may be considered abnormal results which warrant notification of the clinical team by the hospital transfusion service. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207