MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980553245 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.544.544

Predicting Disease Recurrence in Patients with Previous Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: The DASH Prediction Score

2011· article· en· W2980553245 on OpenAlexaff
Alberto Tosetto, Alfonso Iorio, Maura Marcucci, Trevor Baglin, Mary Cushman, Sabine Eichinger, Gualtiero Palareti, Daniela Poli, Campbell R Tait, James D. Douketis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVitamin K antagonistPulmonary embolismProspective cohort studyClinical prediction ruleProportional hazards modelDiseaseInternal medicineAnticoagulant therapySurgeryWarfarin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 544 Background. In patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurring in the absence of major provoking factors, the optimal duration of anticoagulation is anchored on estimating the risk for disease recurrence in the individual patient. Evidence from several studies suggests that, at least in selected patient subgroups, the risk for recurrence may approximates the annual risk for anticoagulant-related major hemorrhage, which is estimated at 1–3%, and a recent ISTH consensus considers an annual risk of recurrence below 5% as acceptable to justify stopping anticoagulant therapy. Aim. To develop a clinical prediction guide that stratifies patients according to recurrence risk and, thereby, facilitate decisions about whether to continue or stop anticoagulation. Methods. Individual patient data meta-analysis of 7 prospective studies enrolling patients with a first episode of objectively diagnosed VTE. Eligible VTE cases were those which occurred in the absence of surgery, trauma, active cancer, immobility, or pregnancy and the puerperium. Follow-up started when anticoagulant therapy was stopped and ended when one of the following occurred: symptomatic, objectively documented, recurrent VTE; death from another cause; resumption of anticoagulant therapy for another reason; or the study ended. Predictors were identified using stratified Cox regression, and the weight of predictors was obtained after model shrinkage to correct for over-optimism. The discriminative ability of the prediction rule was estimated using time-dependent c-statistics, and was internally validated by bootstrap analysis. Results. 1818 consecutively referred cases with unprovoked VTE treated for at least three months with a vitamin K antagonist were eligible for analysis. Abnormal D-dimer after stopping anticoagulation, age < 50 years, male sex and VTE not associated with hormonal therapy (in women) were the main predictors of recurrence. Optimism-corrected regression coefficients were used to derive a prognostic recurrence score (DASH, D-dimer, Age, Sex, Hormonal therapy), that showed a good predicting capability (ROC area=0.71). The DASH score attributes the following points: +2 for positive (abnormal) post-anticoagulation D-dimer, +1 for age ≤ 50 years, +1 for male sex, −2 for hormone use at time of initial VTE (in women only). The annualized recurrence risk was 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 – 3.9) in patients with a DASH score ≤ 1, 6.4% (95% CI 4.8–7.9) in patients with a DASH score 2, and 12.3% (95% CI, 9.9–14.7) in patients with a DASH score ≥ 3, as reported by the Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival plot. By considering at low recurrence risk those patients with a DASH score ≤ 1, life-long anticoagulation might be avoided in 51.6% of patients with unprovoked VTE. Conclusions. The DASH score appears to reliably predict recurrence risk in patients with a first unprovoked VTE and may be used to decide whether anticoagulant therapy should be continued indefinitely or stopped after an initial treatment period of at last three months. Patients with a DASH score ≤ 1 appear to have an annual risk for recurrence (3.1%) that may be sufficiently low to justify stopping anticoagulation in an average patient after 3–6 months of anticoagulation, whereas a DASH score ≥ 2 appears to confer a risk of recurrent VTE that may warrant indefinite anticoagulation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→