MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980564484 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.3297

P3‐266: EARLY DEMENTIA AND EPIGENETICS OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: A CLINICAL APPROACH

2019· article· en· W2980564484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Suresh Kumar, Shalin Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomocysteineDementiaMontreal Cognitive AssessmentVitamin B12MedicineCohortMemory clinicInternal medicineDiseaseNeurologyPediatricsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the main cause of dementia, affects 17-20% of people > 65 years and 50% > 85 years. AD only appears in late adulthood, and the risk to develop the disease doubles every 5 years after age 65. Heritability for AD is estimated to explain between half of total AD cases. Almost half of AD being attributable to non-genetic risk factors in which epigenetics mechanisms are supposedly involved. Expression with epigenetics has been ignored in clinical practice. Early detection and treatment may delay the full blown expression of the more grave disease of memory loss like AD. A consecutive cohort of 183 patients to present to neurology clinic was included; Set of blood test and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening for the work of neurological complaint.ANA immunoassay and titer> 1:40 with positive and type, Vit B12 level < 300, folate <6. Vit D level <30, CRP>.05 Homocystine level >12 were positive. MoCA score of < 26 was MCI 25-20, 20–15 moderate & <15 sever memory loss. M:F, age 16 to 92 yrs. Vitamin B12 levels are significantly correlated with their homocysteine levels (t = −3.6375, df = 13, p-value = 0.003008). For every 1 umol/L increase in homocysteine, there is a 6.652 pg/mL decrease in Vitamin B12. In addition, Homocysteine levels are significantly linearly related with their MoCA scores (t = −3.9187, df = 141, p-value = 0.0001383). For every 1 umol/L increase in Homocysteine levels, there is a .25025 decrease in MoCA scores. In terms of Vitamin D, the data provides evidence that patients’ Vitamin D levels are significantly correlated with their MoCA scores (t = 2.6162, df = 44, p-value = 0.01214). For every 1 increase in Vitamin D, there is a 0.3455 increase in MoCA scores. Mean MoCA score for patients who are ANA positive is significantly less than 26 (t = −2.6437, df = 17, p-value = 0.008532). Active vigilance and early intervention with simple treatable cause of memory loss may delay the onset of dementia and AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207