MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ESTUDO SOBRE ACESSIBILIDADE ARQUITETÔNICA EM UMA ESCOLA MUNICIPAL DE EDUCAÇÃO DE JOVENS E ADULTOS DE BAURU

2019· article· pt· W2980575253 on OpenAlex
Letícia Barboza Petrucelli, Eliana Zanata Zanata

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA DA ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ATIVIDADE MOTORA ADAPTADA · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Arborization and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsAnglo American (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

School inclusion has been provided for by law since 1988. Since then, the issue of students of the Special Education Target-Audience (SETA) has been raised in all teaching modalities. This study focused on Youth and Adult Education (YAE) and aimed to analyze the teaching conditions offered to SETA students regarding architectural accessibility. The study was conducted at an YAE institution in the city of Bauru - SP. The instrument used for data collection was an observation guide. The results were relevant in pointing out that the institution has specific characteristics of an adapted environment, however, in terms of inclusive education, attention is needed in some aspects related to architectural accessibility in order to meet the SETA properly. Received on: 06/28/2019Accepted: 6/30/2019

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it