La salud y la seguridad de los alumnos en centros de capacitación profesional: enfoques, representaciones y género
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this research was to study the health and safety issues at work in vocational training centers. 76 participants (managers, professionals, vocational trainers and students) went through a process of individual and collective interviews, self-administered questionnaires and observation. An analysis of documents on health and safety was also performed. This allowed us to study the experiences surrounding health and safety at work, prescriptions about activities, approaches, roles and factors affecting representations and learning. Students were mainly from Hairdressing (20) and Automated Systems Electromechanics (19) courses. The results show different representations depending on the group of actors. Some students were more worried about their health and safety at work than perceived. Health damage was more frequent for hairdressing students. There were also gender approaches on health and safety at work. The discussion focuses on research methods and approaches, HSW approaches, interventions resulting from the research and elements in need of further development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it