MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980639773 · doi:10.6017/scjr.v14i1.11719

George Hunsinger, Ed. Karl Barth: Post-Holocaust Theologian?

2019· article· en· W2980639773 on OpenAlexaff
David Novák

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Christian-Jewish Relations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicChristian Theology and Mission
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)The HolocaustTheologyPhilosophyArtReligious studiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since his death in 1968, the great Swiss-Protestant theologian Karl Barth has probably been the subject of more books and articles than any other contemporary religious thinker.This fact attests to Barth's great and well-deserved influence on thinkers who include not just his fellow Protestants but many others, including non-Christians.In my own case, as a Jewish student studying to become a rabbi, I first heard Barth's teachings from his eldest son Markus, who was my teacher of New Testament at the University of Chicago in the early 1960's.(I was also privileged to briefly meet the great man himself when he spoke

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Christian-Jewish Relations→Same topicChristian Theology and Mission→French-language works237,207→