MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980664267 · doi:10.1134/s0081543819030192

The Volume Polynomial of Regular Semisimple Hessenberg Varieties and the Gelfand—Zetlin Polytope

2019· article· en· W2980664267 on OpenAlexaff
Megumi Harada, Tatsuya Horiguchi, Mikiya Masuda, Seonjeong Park

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMonomialVariety (cybernetics)Flag (linear algebra)PolytopeIntersection homologyCombinatoricsPure mathematicsCohomologyDiscrete mathematicsAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties are subvarieties of the flag variety Flag(ℂ n ) arising naturally at the intersection of geometry, representation theory, and combinatorics. Recent results of Abe, Horiguchi, Masuda, Murai, and Sato as well as of Abe, DeDieu, Galetto, and Harada relate the volume polynomials of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties to the volume polynomial of the Gelfand–Zetlin polytope GZ( λ ) for λ = ( λ 1 , λ 2 , …, λ n ). In the main results of this paper we use and generalize tools developed by Anderson and Tymoczko, by Kiritchenko, Smirnov, and Timorin, and by Postnikov in order to derive an explicit formula for the volume polynomials of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties in terms of the volumes of certain faces of the Gelfand–Zetlin polytope, and also exhibit a manifestly positive, combinatorial formula for their coefficients with respect to the basis of monomials in the α i := λ i − λ i +1 . In addition, motivated by these considerations, we carefully analyze the special case of the permutohedral variety, which is also known as the toric variety associated to Weyl chambers. In this case, we obtain an explicit decomposition of the permutohedron (the moment map image of the permutohedral variety) into combinatorial ( n − 1)-cubes, and also give a geometric interpretation of this decomposition by expressing the cohomology class of the permutohedral variety in Flag(ℂ n ) as a sum of the cohomology classes of a certain set of Richardson varieties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Steklov Institute of MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207