Le recours à l’Angleterre dans les débats publics de la France révolutionnaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour beaucoup de députés, au-delà de leurs convictions philosophiques ou politiques, il s’agissait pour la plupart, à la suite d’un mouvement initial de sympathie pour le réformisme anglais, de ressusciter ou de maintenir un courant anglophobe dont les racines sortaient en réalité renforcées depuis au moins le milieu du siècle. Ces sentiments hérités d’anglophobie chez les députés se coulent dans la réalité des rapports entre révolution et contre-révolution et se réactualisent dans le contexte politique et diplomatique d’après 1792. Les principes de souveraineté générale, de droit des peuples à l’exercice de leur souveraineté nationale s’accordaient assez mal avec « l’impérialisme » politico-naval et la domination commerciale de l’Angleterre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".