MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980716725 · doi:10.1101/806380

Channel nuclear pore protein 54 directs sexual differentiation and neuronal wiring required for female reproductive behaviors in <i>Drosophila</i>

2019· preprint· en· W2980716725 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohanakarthik P. Nallasivan, Irmgard U. Haussmann, Alberto Civetta, Matthias Soller

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsBiologySexual differentiationMatingDrosophila (subgenus)MutantGeneGeneticsCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The post-mating response induced by male-derived sex-peptide in Drosophila females is a well-established model to elucidate how complex innate behaviors are hard-wired into the brain. Here, we found that the channel nuclear pore protein Nup54 gene is essential for the sex-peptide response as viable mutant alleles do not lay eggs and reduce receptivity upon sex-peptide exposure. Nup54 directs correct wiring of few adult brain neurons that express pickpocket and are required for egg laying, but channel Nups also mediate sexual differentiation and male X-chromosome dosage compensation. Consistent with links of Nups to speciation, the Nup54 promoter is a hot spot for rapid evolution and promoter variants alter expression in transgenes. These results implicate altered expression of Nup54 to the onset of speciation processes leading to changes in neuronal wiring and sexual differentiation as a response to sexual conflict arising from male-derived SP to direct the female post-mating response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research→French-language works237,207→