MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conclusion. Être allemand, combien suis-je ? Introspections inter-allemandes

2011· book-chapter· fr· W2980856164 on OpenAlexaff
Ingo Kolboom

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les propos suivants traduisent des pensées plutôt personnelles qui nous traversent l’esprit à chaque fois qu’on parle de notre pays – à l’occasion « d’anniversaires » sur des sujets tels que la chute du Mur ou de l’unification allemande. Ces brèves réflexions n’ont aucune ambition d’objectivité ; elles baignent plutôt dans cette intime légèreté avec laquelle Paul Valéry portait ses Regards sur le monde actuel (1931). Voici donc nos regards, plus fragiles et peut-être plus contestables, sur n...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207