MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tooth Crack Severity Assessment in the Early Stage of Crack Propagation Using Gearbox Dynamic Model

2019· article· en· W2980889552 on OpenAlex
Xingkai Yang, Ming J. Zuo, Zhigang Tian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Conference of the PHM Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsImpulse (physics)Structural engineeringFracture mechanicsCrack growth resistance curveCrack closureCrack tip opening displacementKurtosisMaterials scienceMathematicsEngineeringStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Localized tooth crack in gearboxes may be reflected in impulse components of gearbox vibration signals. Crack induced impulses have been used for crack detection and fault diagnosis. In reported studies, researchers have used statistical indicators of the identified impulses, such as root mean square (RMS) and kurtosis, to track the growth of crack. These reported statistical indicators are only effective when crack levels are high and they are unable to detect tooth crack and assess crack severity in the early stage of crack propagation. In addition, no reported studies have focused on studying how tooth crack level affects crack induced impulses. Specifically, what the dominant segments of crack induced impulses are and which segment is affected more by crack growth within a certain crack level range. This paper uses dynamic modeling to study how crack level affects crack induced impulses. First, impulses are generated with a spur gearbox dynamic model under constant working conditions. Second, an exponentially damped sinusoidal model is utilized to fit the impulses and the Matrix Pencil Method is used for model parameter estimation. Finally, relationships between crack level and impulses are studied based on the obtained model parameters. The results have shown that the segments in the fifth and the sixth frequency bands of impulses are two dominant segments, while other segments have little contribution, for the gearbox system under investigation. Within a certain crack level range, there exists an impulse segment which is more affected by the crack level. In terms of the early stage of crack propagation, the segment in the sixth frequency band of the impulse is more affected by crack growth. On this basis, three new statistical indicators have been developed with the segment in sixth frequency band of the impulse and have shown their effectiveness for tooth crack severity level assessment in the early stage of crack propagation. These results have good potential for detection and severity assessment of early tooth cracks in gearboxes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it