MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980936412

Raised Without Gender: An analysis of views towards gender-neutral parenting

2019· article· en· W2980936412 on OpenAlexaff
Isha Leibel

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyGender analysisSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyGender studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined opinions in the comment section of a YouTube posted documentary: Raised Without Gender. A content analysis of the top 200 comments on the video showed diverse opinions in the statements made toward gender-neutral parenting approaches from strong support to strong disapproval. Most comments indicated disapproval towards various aspects of gender-neutral parenting and some comments displayed an extreme negative stance towards to the parents modeling the approach. Findings demonstrate both the progressive steps societies have taken towards a more gender-neutral future, yet also highlight the many areas in which binary norms continue to be enforced and supported today.   Faculty Mentor: Diane Symbaluk Department: Sociology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.338
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicYouth Education and Societal DynamicsFrench-language works237,207