MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980959248 · doi:10.33915/etd.6469

Radio Transients and their Environments

2017· dissertation· en· W2980959248 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kaustubh Rajwade

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulsarPhysicsAstrophysicsInterstellar mediumPopulationGalaxyAstronomyRadio spectrumIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interstellar medium is the principal ingredient for star formation and hence, it is necessary to study the properties of the interstellar medium. Radio sources in our Galaxy and beyond can be used as a probe of the intervening medium. In this dissertation, I present an attempt to use radio transients like pulsars and fast radio bursts and their interactions with the environment around them to study interstellar medium. We show that radio emission from pulsars is absorbed by dense ionized gas in their surroundings, causing a turnover in their flux density spectrum that can be used to reveal information about the absorbing medium. We carried out a multi-wavelength observation campaign of PSR B0611+22. The pulsar shows peculiar emission variability that is broadband in nature. Moreover, we show that the flux density spectrum of B0611+22 is unusual which can be attributed to the environment it lies in. We also present predictions of fast radio burst detections from upcoming low frequency surveys. We show that future surveys with the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) will be able to detect~1 radio burst per hour even if the radio burst undergoes significant absorption and scattering. Finally, we present our results of pulsar population synthesis to understand the pulsar population in the Galactic Centre (GC) and place conservative upper limits on the GC pulsar population. We obtain an upper limit of 52 CPs and 10,000 MSPs in the GC. The dense, ionized environment of the GC gives us the opportunity to predict the probability of detection by considering scattering and absorption as the principle sources of flux mitigation. Our results suggest that the optimal frequency range for a pulsar survey in the GC is 9--14~GHz. A larger sample of absorbed spectrum pulsars and fast radio bursts will be beneficial not only for the study of emission processes but also for discerning the properties of the material permeating through space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→