MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2980966231 · doi:10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103283

Exploring links between antisense RNAs and pathogenesis in Ustilago maydis through transcript and gene characterization

2019· article· en· W2980966231 on OpenAlexafffund
Kristi Goulet, Emilee R. M. Storfie, Barry Saville

Bibliographic record

VenueFungal Genetics and Biology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUstilagoBiologyGenePathogenesisGeneticsGenomeGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biotrophic basidiomycete plant pathogens cause billions of dollars in losses to cereal crops annually. The model for this group of fungi is the corn smut pathogen Ustilago maydis. Annotation of its genome identified antisense RNAs (asRNAs) complementary to over half of the coded mRNAs, some of which are present at high levels in teliospores but detected at very low levels or not at all in other cell types, suggesting they have a function in the teliospore or during teliospore formation. Expression of three such asRNAs (as-UMAG_02150, ncRNA1, and as-UMAG_02151) is controlled by two adjacent genomic regions. Deletion of these regions increased transcript levels of all three asRNAs and attenuated pathogenesis. This study investigated the reason for this marked reduction in pathogenesis by: (1) using deletion analyses to assess the involvement of genes, complementary to the asRNAs, in pathogenesis; (2) determining that one of the linked genes encodes a putative xylitol dehydrogenase; and (3) identifying and functionally characterizing asRNAs that could influence expression of protein-coding genes. The results presented suggest that the influence of the asRNAs on pathogenesis occurs through their action at unlinked loci.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFungal Genetics and BiologySame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207