MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2981013770

The Effect of Shock Metamorphism on Zircon of the Huronian Supergroup in proximity to the Sudbury Impact, Ontario, Canada

2019· dissertation· en· W2981013770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josee Menard

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconSupergroupMetamorphismShock metamorphismGeologyGeochemistryShock (circulatory)Impact craterPhysicsAstrobiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U-Pb geochronology of zircon is a widely used tool, but damage to the crystal lattice of zircon and loss of Pb by impact-related shock metamorphism can affect the interpretation of U-Pb isotope data. Five samples of the Huronian Supergroup (HSG), a transitional rift to passive margin sedimentary sequence of siliciclastic rocks deposited at 2.45 – 2.22 Ga, were collected for U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology from the Matinenda, McKim, Ramsay Lake and Mississagi Formations at varying distances from the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC). LA-ICP-MS is used to take repeat U-Pb analyses of individual zircon at varying distances from the edge of the remnant of the SIC. A sample of the Ramsay Lake Formation sampled 4.4 km away from the outer edge of the SIC, described by Menard (2017), contains an anomalously young detrital zircon population (n=13/49) 2590 – 2480 Ma. Individual grains from this population were reanalyzed with 2-12 data points analyzed per zircon. BSE and CL images of the grains did not show any evidence of differential growth events which could cause single grains to contain different age domains. U/Pb ages for these grains could not be reproduced and had elevated discordance, errors and mean square weighted deviation (MSWD) values, consistent with Pb-loss. Some grains appear to have been partially reset by the Sudbury impact, as discordant analyses trend along a discordia line with the impact event at 1850 Ma. Therefore, the 2590 – 2480 Ma population of grains represent Pb-loss ages between their crystallization ages and the impact event. These results imply that, deformation related to the Sudbury impact has preferentially affected the grains of this population, which have suffered more Pb mobility, leading to a false young 207Pb/206Pb ages. \nThe 2590-2480 Ma population is compared to the main population of the same sample. Data from the main population have lower MSWD values and ages remain reproducible within error of the analytical technique. This observation demonstrates that distance from the impact is not the sole factor affecting the reaction of individual zircon to shock metamorphism because within a sample not all of the zircon suffer the same degree of uncertainty. \nSamples were taken from the Elliot Lake area, approximately 90 km away from the Sudbury Igneous Complex to control for potential effects of the Sudbury impact. As expected, the overall sample discordance, uncertainty and MSWD values for the zircon from Elliot Lake is much lower, indicating that as a first order of approximation, distance is the most dominant factor affecting Pb-loss in zircon on a kilometer scale. But, within the shatter cone limit of an impact, factors other than distance also affect the percent of discordant grains within a sample and Pb-loss within zircon. Overall, the effect of the Sudbury impact is more far reaching and may have disrupted U/Pb systems much farther than previously estimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207