MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2981025432 · doi:10.1101/813097

Identification of drug modifiers for RYR1 related myopathy using a multi-species discovery pipeline

2019· preprint· en· W2981025432 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jonathan Volpatti, Yukari Endo, Linda Groom, Stephanie Brennan, Ramil R. Noche, William J. Zuercher, Peter J. Roy, Robert T. Dirksen, James J. Dowling

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoMuscular Dystrophy Association
KeywordsRYR1Ryanodine receptorZebrafishMyogenesisDrug discoveryBiologyComputational biologyMuscular dystrophyBioinformaticsCell biologyMyocyteGeneticsReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ryanodine receptor type I-related myopathies (RYR1-RMs) represent the largest group of non-dystrophic myopathies. RYR1-RMs are associated with severe disabilities and early mortality; despite these facts, there are currently no available treatments. The goal of this study was to identify new therapeutic targets for RYR1-RMs. To accomplish this, we developed a novel discovery pipeline using nematode, zebrafish, and mammalian cell models of the disease. We first performed large-scale drug screens in C. elegans and zebrafish. 74 positive hits were identified in C. elegans , while none were uncovered in the zebrafish. Targeted testing of these hits in zebrafish yielded positive results for two compounds. We examined these compounds using newly created Ryr1 knockout C2C12 cells, and found that p38 inhibition impaired caffeine-induced Ca 2+ release. Lastly, we tested one p38 inhibitor in myotubes from Ryr1 Y524S/+ (YS) mice, and demonstrated that it blunts the aberrant temperature-dependent increase in resting Ca 2+ in these cells. In all, we developed a unique platform for RYR1-RM therapy development that is potentially applicable to a broad range of neuromuscular disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→French-language works237,207→